Post New Answer. Explain what are all the technical steps involved when the data transmission from server via router? Answers were Sorted based on User's Feedback What are difference between Juniper and checkpoint firewall? Is This Answer Correct? ASA Resources are shared for various contexts within the Hardware platform Checkpoint will not have his limitation since you can scale up the base hardware based on requirement on number of Virtual firewalls you would want to implement and also easily portable to new hardware Is This Answer Correct?
More Networking Security Interview Questions. Explain what does cia stand for in security management? What is a cross cable? Last version I used was 6. So if you're looking to create a solution for lesser-skilled operators and technicians to conduct everyday operations tasks, then you're in for some frustration. Layer 2 sticky. This causes issues if you're using a multicast load-sharing scheme on servers, firewalls, etc. ASAs are not a bad solution if your staff is all six figure engineers. I like them for site-to-site VPNs.
I'll avoid them like the plague as a firewall. Them and all other firewall solutions that implement zone architecture as multiple separate policies. There is only one firewall I've experienced that implements a zone architecture in a scalable, manageable fashion; and this is not the place to mention their name. Join Date Posts 3, Rep Power Originally Posted by alienbaby.
Cisco ASA issues as a firewall. Originally Posted by cciesec Version 7. This is actually a false statement. Cisco routers are much better at sitesite VPN.
It offers "many" features that ASA can not. None of those features are available with ASA. One last thing, most Cisco security engineers are overrated and overpaid.
Most of them don't even know how to run tcpdump. Re: Difference between CISCO and Checkpoint Firewall : When it comes to consulting and placing the firewall for the enterprise level , the real challenges come, when you say checkpoint has soo many features and try them to help the customers ,still they fall on Cisco.. Architecture wise i handled , but still deeeper level i need some suggestions please..
Anyway's thanks for the responses so far :. Originally Posted by northlandboy. Every enabled feature will impact CPU negatively. ASA, it's my understanding, is a hodge-podge of PIX, VPN Concentrator and a few Cisco code-bases glued together using a front-end that translates the various pieces of configuration to the different services on the back-end. ASA is it's own OS and it's own appliance. You can choose to use CheckPoint's hardware appliances or roll you own. Most other solutions are simpler to deploy and are cheaper to acquire..
I can usually diagnose a reported problem in less than 5 minutes with CheckPoint with SecureXL disabled. In the end, everything breaks. There are literally dozens of causes for potential failures. That's why you choose solutions that helps you reduce the downtime.
Not just for the firewall itself, but for the applications around it. CheckPoint allows you to gain visibility, not just into the firewall itself, but into the applications that pass through it. If your organization has a goal of five 9's, you're better off if you've chosen solutions that help shorten the downtime. Failures can be reduced, but they cannot be eliminated. You can choose solutions that contribute to quicker isolation of the problem and help recover quicker.
Join Date Posts 25 Rep Power 0. Are you asking why to choose CheckPoint over Cisco or vice versa? Firewalls can be classified in a few different ways. Three important concepts to understand when selecting a firewall solution are the difference between stateful and stateless firewalls, the various form factors in which firewalls are available, and how a next-generation firewall NGFW differs from traditional ones.
The oldest and simplest distinction between firewalls is whether it is stateless or stateful. A stateless firewall inspects traffic on a packet-by-packet basis. The earliest firewalls were limited to checking source and destination IP addresses and ports and other header information to determine if a particular packet met simple access control list requirements. This enabled firewalls to block certain types of traffic from crossing the network boundary, limiting their exploitability and ability to leak sensitive data.
Over time, firewalls grew more sophisticated. Stateful firewalls are designed to track details of a session from its beginning to its end. The greater functionality provided by stateful firewalls means that they have completely replaced stateless ones in common usage. Traditional types of firewalls stateful or stateless are designed to filter traffic based upon predefined rules.
A next-generation firewall NGFW includes all of this functionality but also incorporates additional security features. A NGFW adds additional security solutions such as application control, an intrusion prevention system IPS , and the ability to inspect suspicious content in a sandboxed environment. Another way to distinguish between different types of firewalls is based on how they are implemented. Firewalls generally fall into three categories:.
Software Firewalls: Software firewalls are implemented as code on a computer. These firewalls include both the firewalls built into common operating systems and virtual appliances that contain the full functionality of a hardware firewall but are implemented as a virtual machine.
Cloud Firewalls: Organizations are increasingly moving critical data and resources to the cloud, and cloud-native firewalls are designed to follow suit.
0コメント