This observation links the diversity of bacterial genomes to the virus predation and agreed with our coevolving KtW framework. This co-evolutionary mechanism acts in addition to spatial heterogeneity, which also helps diversity: if a particular strain becomes extinct in a particular region of space, it is possible that it can be re-seeded by the migration or diffusion of that strain from somewhere else.
Thus, at long time scales, the diversity of the system is maintained. Goldenfeld says it was satisfying to see how the use of stochastic modeling enabled the team to include the already well-known coevolutionary arms race within a simple model, from which emerged Kill-the-Winner dynamics. Our work demonstrates the breakdown of the simplest but most widely used version of the theory and presents a way to restore its explanatory power.
It's exciting that our theoretical model not only captured the diversity that we were trying to explain, but also is consistent with a seemingly disconnected strand of data from the field of genomics, thus providing a satisfying narrative that works from the level of ecosystems down to the genome itself.
Goldenfeld and Xue plan to pursue this line of inquiry further. They speculate that diversity is generally related to how far away an ecosystem is from equilibrium.
Future work will attempt to quantify the relationship between diversity and the distance from equilibrium. The researchers' interest in this problem arose from a seemingly different area of science. Goldenfeld explains that this work has implications for open questions in astrobiology and for detecting life on extraterrestrial worlds.
With the groundbreaking discovery by the Cassini mission of global oceans of liquid water on Europa moon of Jupiter and Enceladus moon of Saturn , marine microbial ecology is poised to become an even more active component of astrobiology. Understanding the fundamental mechanisms driving biodiversity -- a pervasive feature of terrestrial ecosystems -- will help us predict the observability of non-terrestrial life on worlds that will be within reach of our probes in the coming decades.
Materials provided by University of Illinois College of Engineering. Note: Content may be edited for style and length. Science News. ScienceDaily, 2 January University of Illinois College of Engineering. A virus-bacteria coevolutionary 'arms race' solves diversity by 'killing the winner'. Retrieved November 12, from www. The scientists demonstrate that there is no simple relationship between Specifically, they wonder whether the portions of cities with higher ScienceDaily shares links with sites in the TrendMD network and earns revenue from third-party advertisers, where indicated.
For example, a group of plant species may be fed on by a particular family of insects, which may frequently in evolutionary time change hosts. The plants may evolve defensive adaptations, such as defensive chemistry, or physical defenses such as spines, which work against large numbers of the species. In time, some of the insects may be able to overcome the plant's defences, leading to further evolution by the plant, and so on. Another related type of evolution is called escape-and-radiate coevolution.
Here, an evolutionary innovation by either partner in a coevolutionary interaction enables an adaptive radiation , or speciation due to the availability of ecological opportunity. For example, it is easy to imagine that this could be a result of the diffuse kind of herbivore-plant coevolution described above.
Phylogenies are very useful in the study of coevolution. If the phylogenies of two closely associated groups, such as host and parasite, are concordant see overhead , this may imply:. However, as we have seen, even contemporaneous cospeciation with concordant phylogenies does not prove that two lineages have coevolved. Instead, we can look at individual adaptations of the interacting species to get an idea of whether coevolution has taken place. Here are some examples:. Plants have many complex chemicals, called "secondary chemicals", which are not obviously used in normal metabolism.
Ehrlich and Raven and others subsequently interpreted this "secondary chemistry" as an example of defensive adaptation by the plants. Many of these compounds for instance, tannins and other phenolic compounds, alkaloids like nicotine, cocaine, opiates and THC, or cyanogenic glycosides are highly toxic. Many animals such as insects have adapted to feeding exclusively on plants with particular defensive chemistry.
This plant is similar to other members of the genus Acacia thorn trees in the pea family , in that it has large spines which presumably protect it against mammalian herbivores another example of coevolution, presumably against mammalian browsers. However, it lacks the cyanogenic glycosides cyanide-producing chemicals found in related Acacia and the thorns in this species are particularly large and hollow, and provides shelter to a species of Pseudomyrmex ant.
The plant also provides proteinaceous food bodies on the tips of the leaflets, which sustain the ant colonies. These ants are particularly nasty I can tell you from personal experience!
It has been shown experimentally that the ants will also remove any caterpillars from the leaves that they patrol. The ants even remove vines and plants from around the base of the tree, creating a bare patch on the soil. Plants of the bullshorn Acacia which have not been occupied by ant colonies are heavily attacked by herbivores and often have vines growing in the branches.
Related Acacia species lack hollow thorns and food bodies, and do not have specific associations with ants. They also have many cyanogenic glycosides in their leaves. This data strongly supports the idea that the bullshorn Acacia has evolved a close, mutualistic association with the ants in order to protect themselves from herbivores and also plant competitors.
It also supports the idea that the cyanogenic glycosides found in other species have a defensive role; a role which has been taken over by Pseudomyrmex in the bullshorn Acacia.
Egg mimicry in Passiflora. Similarly, we have already given examples of egg-mimicry in Passiflora , which protects plants against species of Heliconius butterflies. Female Heliconius avoid laying eggs on plants already occupied by eggs, because first instar larvae of Heliconius are highly cannibalistic; the plants exploit this habit of Heliconius by creating fake yellow eggs as deciduous buds, stipule tips, or as part of the "extrafloral nectaries" on young leaves.
Clearly, the plant, whose defenses of cyanogenic glycosides, alkaloids, and a host of other secondary compounts, have been breached by Heliconius , has counterevolved new defenses against this genus. Predators have obviously evolved to exploit their prey, with hunting ability being at a premium.
Ecologists have found it relatively easy to document the various differences in the ways that ecologically similar animal species use their environment and resources.
In many cases nothing more than a pair of binoculars and careful observation is required. Studying resource partitioning in plants can be much more challenging, and the relative lack of such examples has led many ecologists to wonder whether plants really do show resource partitioning; after all, they all require a limited suite of resources light, water, and nutrients.
However, ecologists do not give up easily, and recent work has shown that coexisting plant species often differ in the forms of nitrogen e. Differences in rooting depth and light-use optima have also been documented. Nevertheless, how common or important resource partitioning is in plants remains uncertain and is an active area of current research.
Bombus spp. Species have proboscises of different lengths, enabling them to specialize in the exploitation of plants with different length corollas. Species with similar length proboscises occur at different altitudes Pyke All rights reserved.
When species use a resource similarly in one respect i. For example, the bumblebee study mentioned above was conducted over sites varying in altitude. Pyke , the author of this work, found that although several bumblebee species had similarly long proboscises and so could forage on similar species of plant, they were differentially specialized to altitude, so that sites at different altitudes were dominated by a different pair of long- and short-length proboscis species.
Another striking example comes from tree-dwelling Anolis lizards on the Caribbean island of Bimini Schoener ; Figure 2. In this case, species either foraged in the same places as determined by the thickness of branches they perched on or ate similar sized prey, but in no cases did two species do both of these. In contrast, individuals of the same species commonly showed a high degree of overlap along both of these resource axes Figure 2.
Ecological theory shows that interspecific competition will be less likely to result in competitive exclusion if it is weaker than intraspecific competition Chesson Resource partitioning can result in exactly this! By consuming slightly different forms of a limiting resource or using the same limiting resource at a different place or time, individuals of different species compete less with one another interspecific competition than individuals of the same species intraspecific competition.
Species, therefore, limit their own population growth more than they limit that of potential competitors, and resource partitioning acts to promote the long-term coexistence of competing species.
Other theories have been put forward that attempt to explain the coexistence of large numbers of species in local communities, and assessing their importance relative to resource partitioning is likely to be an active area of research for years to come. There is no doubt, however, that mechanisms reducing interspecific relative to intraspecific competition act to promote coexistence, and resource partitioning can achieve this.
So far we have discussed the phenomenon of resource partitioning and its role in reducing interspecific competition and therefore promoting coexistence.
Where does resource partitioning come from in the first place i. Competition can limit the growth, and ultimately the reproductive success, of individuals. It can consequently serve as a selection pressure driving differential reproductive success and the evolution of traits that enable organisms to use resources differently compared to their competitors.
This process has been clearly demonstrated in the evolutionary events that have followed the colonization of volcanic islands. For example, a single species of seed-eating finch originally colonized the Galapagos Islands and was faced with a diverse range of seed types and sizes. However, the beak of the founding species only allowed it to eat a small subset of the available seed types and sizes. The advantages gained by individuals that were able to exploit slightly different seed types drove evolution of many new species, each with different shaped beaks enabling them to specialize in a particular size of seed Grant There is convincing evidence that competition and not another selection pressure such as predation drove — and maintains — differences in beak sizes between these species.
When species occur on their own on an island i. When several species occur on the same island however, they show clear differences in beak shapes, showing that it is interspecific competition that maintains differences between species and resultant resource partitioning Figure 3. An interesting new twist has been added to this story of the evolution of resource partitioning.
Around 25 years ago the island of Daphne Major, originally host to just a single species of Darwin's finch Geospiza fortis was invaded by another, larger beaked species G. Amazingly, researchers have documented a rapid evolutionary shift in the sizes of beaks in G. In response to severe competition for larger seeds it has evolved to take full advantage of small seeds.
Figure 3: A classic example of character displacement When multiple species of Darwin's finches co-occur on an island, they show differences in bill depth and eat different sized seeds compared to when they are alone on an island. Humans are causing widespread extinctions of species on local and even global scales. Recently, ecologists have realized that resource partitioning may have important implications for our understanding of the effects of losing species on the functioning of entire ecosystems.
Groups of ecologically similar species may all contribute toward the same, aggregate ecological processes; for example, grasses in a meadow all contribute towards overall primary production and predatory spiders in the same meadow may all contribute towards the control of plant herbivores. Maintenance of such ecological processes is important for the overall functioning of ecosystems, including ecosystem services that humans benefit from.
Resource partitioning can help scientists understand how aggregate ecological processes will be impacted by species extinction. If species show a high degree of resource partitioning, when a species is lost so too is the capacity of the ecological group to exploit the particular slice of the resource pie that the deleted species was adapted to exploit.
For example, extinction of a species of grass that was uniquely specialized to use ammonium as a source of nitrogen would leave ammonium in the soil unused. Because this slice ammonium of the resource pie will not be exploited, the overall rate of new growth of meadow grass primary production , as well as associated processes like uptake of carbon dioxide and production of oxygen, will be reduced.
A vast number of recent experiments show that species extinction, on average, reduces levels of ecosystem processes Cardinale et al. Resource partitioning is thought to play an important role in causing this effect, although ecologists are only just beginning to directly test this Griffin et al.
There is an important application of this ongoing work — by considering the degree of resource partitioning among species scientists may be able to predict those ecosystems that are most vulnerable to the loss of species. The long-term coexistence of ecologically similar species, and thus the astounding diversity of life on Earth, has long fascinated ecologists.
Resource partitioning may hold the answer to the coexistence of species that make a living in similar ways i. Indeed, the benefit of tapping into resources that another competing species cannot use as effectively can be so great that following the addition of a competitor, new traits can literally evolve right in front of the eyes of scientists!
The astounding diversity of species on Earth is at least partly attributable to the various ways in which potentially competing species have evolved specialized traits and intricately partitioned resource exploitation. Ecologists are beginning to realize that the very resource partitioning that helps maintain species diversity may also leave the overall functioning of ecosystems highly sensitive to species extinction. Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 31 , — Finke, D.
Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities.
0コメント